I belive that what pierce meant when he said that good and evil
are not subjective is that certain deeds are good, and certain
deeds are evil, the way you interpreted this is that if one is
evil, he cannot do good, and if one is good he cannot do evil,
which we all know is far from the truth, I am good, yet have
done evil things, and so many evil people have likewise done
good. What I belive pierce was trying to get across, is that
when something is evil, it is evil for anyone who commits that
act, and when something is good, it is good for anyone who commits
the act. If, Pierce, I am wrong about this, and you really did
mean that evil cannot do good and vice versa, than I am sorry.

Seek wisdom, know good, resist evil
dalithus

Penned by my hand on the 19th of Lupar, in the year 231 AF.