Achaean News

Previous Article | Back to News Summary | Next Article
Public News Post #2850

i think i mean strife

Written by: Lord Perrin "Goldeneyes" Aybara
Date: Monday, October 18th, 1999
Addressed to: Everyone


i don't remember entirely who brought up the "evil" utopia but it is the truth
As to whomever said it was backwards you are wrong
I will explain my philosophy in a minute
First of all, though, i will make my statements on good and evil.
someone has said that evil is not subjective. it is. so is good. i will soon be getting married. i consider that a "good" act. I have helped several fellow citizens at different times. i also consider this a "good" act. yet because i kill shastaan women, and such, my alignment is on the evil side.
is it not possible for evil to have times when they commit "good" acts and vice versa? I am sure there are churchies who have killed things that are considered "good" for the expereince of fighting them. just because our alignment says we are "sinful" it doesn't mean we are totally incapable of doing good things. the reverse is also true. Just because your alignment is "saintly" or whatever doesn't mean you are incapable of commiting an evil act. I consider myself more nuetral than evil because i will do good deeds one day and evil deeds the next. however, i prefer the evil guilds because they will ultimately rule
which brings up my previous statements
It is possible and highly likely to occur that an evil utopia would be based on a democracy or some other form of representative government. Just because someone is evil doesn't mean they don't have honor after all. is it not possible to respect the leader even if you don't like the amount of power above yours they have? i can post how i see this utopia of strife's working if anyone wishes. i have designed several cities in my head at one point or another and this would only be moderately difficult.
it is true that strength can be used for good, but there are occasions when good does not use their strength or use it in an evil way.
for example
i could go kill goblins until i was angelic and then insult say echo(the first churchie name that came to mind) causing her to want to kill me. if she did would that not be an evil act? my alignment is absolute after all therefore she would have to see my insult as a complement right? because my alignment says angelic i am incapable of commiting an evil deed therefore... (figure it out yourself, my head hurts)

that is all for now from the nuetrally insane Theran
who remains

As Always,


Lord of the Two Rivers, Perrin "Goldeneyes" Aybara

p.s. doncha jus love the way i end my posts????

Penned by my hand on the 19th of Lupar, in the year 231 AF.


Previous Article | Back to News Summary | Next Article
Previous | Summary | Next
Public News Post #2850

i think i mean strife

Written by: Lord Perrin "Goldeneyes" Aybara
Date: Monday, October 18th, 1999
Addressed to: Everyone


i don't remember entirely who brought up the "evil" utopia but it is the truth
As to whomever said it was backwards you are wrong
I will explain my philosophy in a minute
First of all, though, i will make my statements on good and evil.
someone has said that evil is not subjective. it is. so is good. i will soon be getting married. i consider that a "good" act. I have helped several fellow citizens at different times. i also consider this a "good" act. yet because i kill shastaan women, and such, my alignment is on the evil side.
is it not possible for evil to have times when they commit "good" acts and vice versa? I am sure there are churchies who have killed things that are considered "good" for the expereince of fighting them. just because our alignment says we are "sinful" it doesn't mean we are totally incapable of doing good things. the reverse is also true. Just because your alignment is "saintly" or whatever doesn't mean you are incapable of commiting an evil act. I consider myself more nuetral than evil because i will do good deeds one day and evil deeds the next. however, i prefer the evil guilds because they will ultimately rule
which brings up my previous statements
It is possible and highly likely to occur that an evil utopia would be based on a democracy or some other form of representative government. Just because someone is evil doesn't mean they don't have honor after all. is it not possible to respect the leader even if you don't like the amount of power above yours they have? i can post how i see this utopia of strife's working if anyone wishes. i have designed several cities in my head at one point or another and this would only be moderately difficult.
it is true that strength can be used for good, but there are occasions when good does not use their strength or use it in an evil way.
for example
i could go kill goblins until i was angelic and then insult say echo(the first churchie name that came to mind) causing her to want to kill me. if she did would that not be an evil act? my alignment is absolute after all therefore she would have to see my insult as a complement right? because my alignment says angelic i am incapable of commiting an evil deed therefore... (figure it out yourself, my head hurts)

that is all for now from the nuetrally insane Theran
who remains

As Always,


Lord of the Two Rivers, Perrin "Goldeneyes" Aybara

p.s. doncha jus love the way i end my posts????

Penned by my hand on the 19th of Lupar, in the year 231 AF.


Previous | Summary | Next