There is never a better way of giving credence to an opposing idea than having to talk using, although intelligible, semantically incorrect words.

Im saying that although it is definitely not a matter of semantics, or of rhetoric at that, your inability to express your ideas in more appropriate words and in more appropriate ways are the mark of a creature of lesser intelligence... That in your post you're in fact making as the gist of your presumptions semantics: that of the Church's "improper" following of its Codex and its beliefs written as they are. Isn't it odd, then that you are definitely suggesting that by your grammar and spelling, your rhetoric, and thus the main point of reasoning in your post is wrong.

If you have to say such things, then just refer to Cyre's post. I think that IF it does, it will do a lot more better job than yours. I hope you wont take it harshly against me. Im just fighting fire with fire.

-Barachiel-

Penned by my hand on the 19th of Miraman, in the year 271 AF.