Rahl,

I rarely post, but I felt the need to post on this matter...

Sinistar knew full well the responsiblity he was taking in becoming
Guild Master of the Infernals. It was him, not Pierce that declared
that his guild would be against those of us who are of the Church.

You say it was wrong of Pierce to challenge Sinistar under a banner
of peace. Would your words be any different if he had of left and
challenged Sinistar later after their meeting?

You also say that he exploited Sinistars weakness? If Sinistar is weak
is he not one of those who he proclaims to want to destroy? The weak and
worthy of Achaea?

You say you side with the Infernals, but aren't the
the things you abhor, the things that evil ones would do?

The only honor I have found in the Infernals as of yet stands
with Lord Sartan. Though he is the embodiment of all things I
have sworn to fight against, his honor is something that all mortal
could learn from.

Those that choose the path of the Infernals knew what they were
getting into when the took the oath, and should live with their choice
just as the rest of us live with ours.


Penned by my hand on the 18th of Valnuary, in the year 230 AF.