Achaean News

Previous Article | Back to News Summary | Next Article
Public News Post #2714

Sinistar and the Infernals

Written by: Gaian Guru Rahl the Flying Elephant
Date: Monday, October 4th, 1999
Addressed to: Sir Pierce, the Vorpal Blacksmith


How Chivalrous is it to use one's own honor against him?
Knowing full well that Sinistar had no choice to accept your challenge,
and also knowing full well that his newfound powers are only slowly
seeping into him, and knowing full well it would be an unballanced
fight, you throw down the gauntlet to him. And on top of that,
you challenge his second, who is even less capable of a fight.
There is no honour in that Pierce.

I am not declarign that i am siding witht he Infernals, or anyone
else for that matter. It is well known where my loyaltys are: my
guild, my order, the Oakstone, and my race. However, deceit, trechery,
lies, curruption, all of these things i abhore. And quite frankly,
i'm seeing that Pierce showed no honour in what he did, and since
the Paladins are 'supposed' to be honourable and chivalrous, going
against that is lie and curruption. Exploiting a screaming weakness
is trechery. And picking a fight under a truce is deceit.
Need i say more?

Good day to you
Rahl

Penned by my hand on the 17th of Valnuary, in the year 230 AF.


Previous Article | Back to News Summary | Next Article
Previous | Summary | Next
Public News Post #2714

Sinistar and the Infernals

Written by: Gaian Guru Rahl the Flying Elephant
Date: Monday, October 4th, 1999
Addressed to: Sir Pierce, the Vorpal Blacksmith


How Chivalrous is it to use one's own honor against him?
Knowing full well that Sinistar had no choice to accept your challenge,
and also knowing full well that his newfound powers are only slowly
seeping into him, and knowing full well it would be an unballanced
fight, you throw down the gauntlet to him. And on top of that,
you challenge his second, who is even less capable of a fight.
There is no honour in that Pierce.

I am not declarign that i am siding witht he Infernals, or anyone
else for that matter. It is well known where my loyaltys are: my
guild, my order, the Oakstone, and my race. However, deceit, trechery,
lies, curruption, all of these things i abhore. And quite frankly,
i'm seeing that Pierce showed no honour in what he did, and since
the Paladins are 'supposed' to be honourable and chivalrous, going
against that is lie and curruption. Exploiting a screaming weakness
is trechery. And picking a fight under a truce is deceit.
Need i say more?

Good day to you
Rahl

Penned by my hand on the 17th of Valnuary, in the year 230 AF.


Previous | Summary | Next