Achaean News

Previous Article | Back to News Summary | Next Article
Public News Post #2260

Specifically the druids

Written by: Strife
Date: Thursday, July 29th, 1999
Addressed to: Everyone


To those in guild political turmoil,

Obviously, if the Druids and ex-Druids posted their war on the public section, it must have been to get public opinion, so here's mine.

Portis and Clyrissa constantly whine on how their views were supressed, and that they shouldn't have been kicked out for supressing their views, so on, and so forth. I get the impression so far that the outguilding had to do with these views (that might not be the case, but so far thats what the posts say). If these views of theirs were extremely radical, I can see why they would be outguilded. I suggest, since you brought the war to the public post in the first place, that you bring to light what those views are, to keep the public at rest. If the views are too radical, Charnley's name will be cleared. If your views are normal, and conventional, then your names will be cleared. As for the other Druids (those who are involved, I mean) your views must differ from theirs, and it might be best that you hear theirs, if you havent already. Maybe a resolution can be found, and this war will stop (and if it doesnt, I will remain reading the posts and laughing maniachly at the strife between the *supposed to

And about Silvaria's post, if someone was bugging the hell out of you, it does seem fair to kill them (mwa ha ha), but maybe you should do something to fix your public opinion so that stuff like this wont repeat itself 😉

The everlaughing Strife

Penned by my hand on the 3rd of Miraman, in the year 225 AF.


Previous Article | Back to News Summary | Next Article
Previous | Summary | Next
Public News Post #2260

Specifically the druids

Written by: Strife
Date: Thursday, July 29th, 1999
Addressed to: Everyone


To those in guild political turmoil,

Obviously, if the Druids and ex-Druids posted their war on the public section, it must have been to get public opinion, so here's mine.

Portis and Clyrissa constantly whine on how their views were supressed, and that they shouldn't have been kicked out for supressing their views, so on, and so forth. I get the impression so far that the outguilding had to do with these views (that might not be the case, but so far thats what the posts say). If these views of theirs were extremely radical, I can see why they would be outguilded. I suggest, since you brought the war to the public post in the first place, that you bring to light what those views are, to keep the public at rest. If the views are too radical, Charnley's name will be cleared. If your views are normal, and conventional, then your names will be cleared. As for the other Druids (those who are involved, I mean) your views must differ from theirs, and it might be best that you hear theirs, if you havent already. Maybe a resolution can be found, and this war will stop (and if it doesnt, I will remain reading the posts and laughing maniachly at the strife between the *supposed to

And about Silvaria's post, if someone was bugging the hell out of you, it does seem fair to kill them (mwa ha ha), but maybe you should do something to fix your public opinion so that stuff like this wont repeat itself 😉

The everlaughing Strife

Penned by my hand on the 3rd of Miraman, in the year 225 AF.


Previous | Summary | Next